Garrard v. Moffett

51 Ga. 93
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Ga. 93 (Garrard v. Moffett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrard v. Moffett, 51 Ga. 93 (Ga. 1874).

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

Moffett ruled Mahaffy, as constable, to-show cause why he should not pay over to him the amount of money in his hands, collected on two executions issued in his favor against Saulsbury. The constable showed for cause that the executions ivere obtained against Sanlsbury, as garnishee of J. T. Thweatt, and that Garrard, executor, etc., had placed in his hands an execution against J. T. and R. R. Thweatt, issued on a judgment of older date than the judgments obtained against Saulsbury, the garnishee of J. T. Thweatt. Garrard, executor, Avas made a party to the proceeding before the superior court. The court decided that the money in the constable’s hands should be paid to the executions issued on the garnishment judgments against Saulsbury, and not to the execution in favor of Garrard, issued on the common law judgment of older date against the Tlweatts, to Avhich decision Garrard excepted.

In our judgment, this decision of the court ivas error: Code, section 3545; Shorter vs. Wimble & Company, 41 Georgia Reports, 691.

Let the judgment of- the court below be xwersed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Wray
242 S.E.2d 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Anderson v. Ashford & Co.
160 S.E. 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Herndon v. Braddy
146 S.E. 495 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Ga. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrard-v-moffett-ga-1874.