Garr v. Childrens Amusement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garr v. Childrens Amusement Corp.

277 A.D.2d 984

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 984 (Garr v. Childrens Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garr v. Childrens Amusement Corp., 277 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law to quiet title to a certain lot in Kings County, respondent City of New York claims title to the lot as a public highway. Respondents Childrens Amusement Corporation and Chassen are abutting owners. Appellant is the holder of a first mortgage and of a transfer of tax lien on the premises involved. Respondents have alleged in their answers, as cross complaints against appellant, that the City of New York has title to the lot and that appellant’s mortgage and transfer of tax lien are void. This is an appeal from three separate orders denying appellant’s motions to make the cross complaints more definite and certain and to dismiss the cross complaints for insufficiency. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each respondent filing a brief. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law to quiet title to a certain lot in Kings County, respondent City of New York claims title to the lot as a public highway. Respondents Childrens Amusement Corporation and Chassen are abutting owners. Appellant is the holder of a first mortgage and of a transfer of tax lien on the premises involved. Respondents have alleged in their answers, as cross complaints against appellant, that the City of New York has title to the lot and that appellant’s mortgage and transfer of tax lien are void. This is an appeal from three separate orders denying appellant’s motions to make the cross complaints more definite and certain and to dismiss the cross complaints for insufficiency. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each respondent filing a brief. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garr-v-childrens-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1950.