Garr v. Boynton
This text of 66 S.E. 552 (Garr v. Boynton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon a certiorari from a justice’s court, where there has been no appeal to a jury, only questions of law can he considered. Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 783 (31 S. E. 25).
2. Even if a deed of assignment for the benefit of creditors is ever superior to a pre-existing lien for labor (though unforeclosed), it is not superior thereto where the assignee takes with notice of the lien and the laborer elects not to claim under the assignment. Carter v. Lipsey, 70 Ga. 417, 420; Camp v. Meyer, 47 Ga. 414, 425, 426.
3. There was evidence from which the magistrate could have found that the assignee took with notice of the plaintiff’s lien. Hence, the judge of the superior court erred in holding', as a matter of law (for there had been no appeal), that the assignment had priority over the lien. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 552, 7 Ga. App. 235, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garr-v-boynton-gactapp-1909.