Garofalo v. Sidote

267 A.D. 960, 47 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s application to place this action on the Military Suspense Calendar, and setting the ease down for trial on a day certain, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The appellant, one of two defendants in this negligence action, is now overseas in the military service of the United States. Absence from a trial in which Ms liabilities are being adjudged is prima facie prejudicial. (Boone v. Lightner, 319 U. S. 561, 575.) This prejudice is not overcome by the plaintiff’s consent to the reading of the testimony given by the appellant in a prior action in which the liability of the respective defendants in this action as between themselves was litigated. The plaintiff was not a party to that action and the issues here involved are not necessarily the same. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 992.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garofalo v. Sidote, 267 A.D. 960, 47 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 960 (Garofalo v. Sidote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowery Savings Bank v. Pellegrino
185 Misc. 912 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)