Garny v. Katz

56 N.W. 912, 86 Wis. 321, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 169
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 7, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Obtok, J.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $560.08. Afterwards, and at the same term of the court, the defendant moved for a new trial on the minutes of the court, and the motion was granted without any reasons stated therefor, and without terms. When no reasons are given for granting a new trial after a verdict, the presumption is that it was granted on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence, and in such case the court should impose the terms of the payment of the taxable-costs of the former trial. Pound v. Roan, 45 Wis. 129; Smith v. Lander, 48 Wis. 587; Schraer v. Stefan, 80 Wis. 653. The order appealed from is therefore erroneous. The order was no abuse of discretion, but a mere omission of the terms.

By the Cotort.— The order of the superior court is reversed, and the cause remanded with direction to grant a new trial in the case upon the terms of the payment of the taxable costs of the former trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garny v. Katz, 56 N.W. 912, 86 Wis. 321, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 169 (Wis. 1893).

56 N.W. 912 (Garny v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frost v. Meyer
118 N.W. 811 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Godfrey v. Godfrey
106 N.W. 814 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
Giese v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
92 N.W. 356 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Mills v. Conley
86 N.W. 203 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Becker v. Holm
75 N.W. 999 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Wilson v. City of Eau Claire
61 N.W. 290 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)