Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Garnto v. State

Garnto v. State

149 S.E. 150, 40 Ga. App. 136, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 9, 1929·No. 19750·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Garnto was convicted of violating the “labor-contract law.” He assigns error upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. Upon the authority of Johnson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 701-2 (90 S. E. 355), and King v. State, 3G Ga. App. 272 (136 S. E. 466), the evidence adduced upon the trial of this ease was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. A. Merritt, for plaintiff in error. Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garnto v. State, 149 S.E. 150, 40 Ga. App. 136, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

149 S.E. 150 (Garnto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
90 S.E. 355 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
King v. State
136 S.E. 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)