Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Garnto v. State

Garnto v. State

149 S.E. 150, 40 Ga. App. 136, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 9, 1929
Docket19750
StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 150 (Garnto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garnto v. State, 149 S.E. 150, 40 Ga. App. 136, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Garnto was convicted of violating the “labor-contract law.” He assigns error upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. Upon the authority of Johnson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 701-2 (90 S. E. 355), and King v. State, 3G Ga. App. 272 (136 S. E. 466), the evidence adduced upon the trial of this ease was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. A. Merritt, for plaintiff in error. Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
90 S.E. 355 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
King v. State
136 S.E. 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 150, 40 Ga. App. 136, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garnto-v-state-gactapp-1929.