Garnett v. State
362 S.W.3d 487, 2012 WL 942930, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 363
Opinion
ORDER
Timothy H. Garnett appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garnett v. State, 362 S.W.3d 487, 2012 WL 942930, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
362 S.W.3d 487 (Garnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Adr
362 S.W.3d 487 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)