Garner v. U.S. District Court of SC

357 F. App'x 519
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2009·No. No. 09-7488·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Garner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommenda[520]*520tion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named, Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 888, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garner v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for SC, No. 3:08-cv-03913-TLW (D.S.C. July 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garner v. U.S. District Court of SC, 357 F. App'x 519 (4th Cir. 2009).

357 F. App'x 519 (Garner v. U.S. District Court of SC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related