Garner v. United States

53 F. App'x 345
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2002
DocketNos. 01-5648, 01-5684
StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 345 (Garner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner v. United States, 53 F. App'x 345 (6th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

Pro se federal prisoners Arthur Garner and Thomas Coates appeal district court judgments that denied their respective 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions. These cases have been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

The judgments that denied § 2255 relief are affirmed. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), may not be applied retroactively in an initial § 2255 motion. Goode v. United States, 305 F.3d 378, 384 (6th Cir. 2002). Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Kevin Antonio Goode v. United States
305 F.3d 378 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. App'x 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-united-states-ca6-2002.