Garner v. State

125 So. 693, 23 Ala. App. 367, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 10
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1930
Docket5 Div. 775.
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 693 (Garner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner v. State, 125 So. 693, 23 Ala. App. 367, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

In his oral charge the court instructed the jury: “Gentlemen of the jury, the law says if he had in his possession any part of a still that was to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquor, why the effect would be the same as if he had the whole still in his possession.”

This charge is not in accord with the uniform holding of this court. Pate v. State, 19 Ala. App. 642, 99 So. 833; Berry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 102, 100 So. 922; Lindsey v. State, 18 Ala. App. 494, 93 So. 331.

Section 4657 of the Code of 1923 does not create a crime, but is a rule of evidence. The crime is fixed by the preceding section.

*368 For obvious reasons, we do not discuss the. evidence.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

•Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berry v. State
100 So. 922 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Lindsey v. State
93 So. 331 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Pate v. State
99 So. 833 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 693, 23 Ala. App. 367, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-state-alactapp-1930.