Garner v. State

125 So. 693, 23 Ala. App. 367, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 10
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1930·No. 5 Div. 775.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

In his oral charge the court instructed the jury: “Gentlemen of the jury, the law says if he had in his possession any part of a still that was to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquor, why the effect would be the same as if he had the whole still in his possession.”

This charge is not in accord with the uniform holding of this court. Pate v. State, 19 Ala. App. 642, 99 So. 833; Berry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 102, 100 So. 922; Lindsey v. State, 18 Ala. App. 494, 93 So. 331.

Section 4657 of the Code of 1923 does not create a crime, but is a rule of evidence. The crime is fixed by the preceding section.

*368 For obvious reasons, we do not discuss the. evidence.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

•Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garner v. State, 125 So. 693, 23 Ala. App. 367, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

125 So. 693 (Garner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berry v. State
100 So. 922 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Lindsey v. State
93 So. 331 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Pate v. State
99 So. 833 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)