Garner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Fed. Cl. 140
United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 27, 2019·No. 17-1166·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 31, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED ALEXIS GARNER, on behalf of K.G., * * No. 17-1166V Petitioner, * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Decision on Damages; Proffer; Table Injury; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Varicella Vaccine; Disseminated Varicella * Vaccine-Strain Viral Disease. Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John P. Valente, III, The Valente Law Group, Crofton, MD, for petitioner. Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON DAMAGES1

On August 27, 2017, Alexis Garner, on behalf of K.G. (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”).2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleged that her minor child K.G. received a varicella vaccination on May 18, 2015, and as a result, K.G. suffered from “two strokes and hemiparalysis.” Id. at 1. On February 20, 2018, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) stating that petitioner’s claim was appropriate for compensation. Respondent’s Report (“Resp. Rpt.”) (ECF No. 17) at 1. Specifically, respondent agreed that K.G.’s alleged injury is consistent with disseminated varicella vaccine-strain disease, there are no other identified causes, and she suffered the sequelae of this injury for more than six months. Id. Accordingly, on March 5, 2019, I issued a ruling that petitioner was entitled to compensation. Ruling on Entitlement (ECF No. 18). The case moved to the damages phase.

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the opinion. Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id. 2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. On July 31, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on an award of compensation, which indicates petitioner’s agreement to compensation on the terms set forth therein. Proffer (ECF No. 53). The proffer is attached hereto as Appendix A.

Consistent with the terms of the proffer, I hereby award the following compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

1) A lump sum payment of $853,237.17, representing compensation for lost earnings ($603,435.45), pain and suffering ($235,000.00), and life care expenses for Year One ($14,801.72), in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of K.G., for the benefit of K.G.;

2) A lump sum payment of $31,629.40, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Maryland Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and

Maryland Department of Health Division of Recoveries and Financial Services P.O. Box 13045 Baltimore, MD 21203 MA # 49-005154-300 Attn: Raheem King, Recoveries Officer

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Maryland Department of Health;

3) A lump sum payment of $70,409.79, representing compensation for satisfaction of the Kaiser Mid-Atlantic lien, payable jointly to petitioner and

The Rawlings Company LLC P.O. Box 2000 La Grange, KY 40031 Reference No.: 78461650 Attn: Steven D. Taylor

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to The Rawlings Company LLC; and

4) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the proffer, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A in the proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

2 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the proffer and this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). 3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) ALEXIS GARNER, on behalf of K.G., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1166V ) Special Master Gowen SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ) ECF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

The respondent engaged life care planner, Laura E. Fox, MSN, RN, CDDN, CNLCP, and

petitioner engaged Cathryn Winslow, BSN, CDMS, CCM, CNLCP, to provide an estimation of

K.G.’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine

related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, filed February 20, 2018. All items

of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated

by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for K.G., attached hereto as Tab A. 1

Respondent proffers that K.G. should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life

care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

-1- B. Lost Future Earnings

Respondent proffers that K.G. should be awarded lost future earnings as provided under

the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award

for K.G.’s lost earnings is $603,435.45. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that K.G. should be awarded $235,000.00 in actual and projected

pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has

been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Petitioner represents that she has not incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to

K.G.’s vaccine-related injury.

E. Maryland Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that K.G. should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of Maryland

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2019).

Garner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Garner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a