Garner v. Floyd County
This text of 101 S.E. 918 (Garner v. Floyd County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in this case was employed as a “concrete foreman” on behalf of Eloyd County by the superintendent of public works, who had general written authority, duly entered upon the minutes, from the board of roads and revenues of the county to employ men for the building and repairing of the public roads and bridges of the county. The plaintiff, to meet a demurrer interposed by the county, amended his original petition by alleging “that the contract of employment therein set forth was entered upon the minutes of the commissioners of roads and revenues of said county.” Upon the trial of the case it appeared that the specific contract with the plaintiff was not in writing and had never been entered upon the minutes of the board of roads and revenues of Eloyd County. Under the ruling stated in the headnote, and the authorities there cited, the court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, did not err in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 693, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-floyd-county-gactapp-1920.