Garner v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Garner v. City of Kansas City

342 S.W.3d 926, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 897, 2011 WL 2534847

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2011

DocketWD 73128

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 926 (Garner v. City of Kansas City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garner v. City of Kansas City, 342 S.W.3d 926, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 897, 2011 WL 2534847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Walter Garner was employed by the City of Kansas City from January 20, 2010, until May 27, 2010, when he was discharged. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied Garner’s claim for unemployment benefits, concluding that he was discharged for misconduct. Garner appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Walter Garner was employed by the City of Kansas City from January 20, 2010, until May 27, 2010, when he was discharged. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied Garner’s claim for unemployment benefits, concluding that he was discharged for misconduct. Garner appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 926, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 897, 2011 WL 2534847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-city-of-kansas-city-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack