Garner v. Burrell

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedJanuary 11, 2022
Docket3:21-cv-01183
StatusUnknown

This text of Garner v. Burrell (Garner v. Burrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner v. Burrell, (S.D. Ill. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CLEVELAND GARNER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 21-cv-1183-NJR

THOMAS BURRELL, LU WALKER, BOB ALLARD, and B. HARRIS,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: This matter is before the Court for case management. On December 13, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Cleveland Garner’s Complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. 8). He was directed to file an Amended Complaint. Garner first filed a response (Doc. 9) to the Court’s Order which included the Court’s original Order (Doc. 8) with underlined portions and responsive pages indicating how he believes Dr. Burrell, Bob Allard, and B. Harris wronged him (Doc. 8). Subsequently, on January 3, 2022, he filed a document which this Court labeled as an Amended Complaint (Doc. 9). Unfortunately, however, this document only consists of two pages which describes the issues Garner has had with his teeth since 2017. He identifies Dr. Burrell as the dentist who fixed his teeth. Although the Court labeled Garner’s second filing as an Amended Complaint, the document does not stand on its own as an Amended Complaint. Further, it does not include the allegations which he included in his response (Doc. 9). Neither of these documents stands on its own as an Amended Complaint, and the Court will not accept piecemeal amendments. Because an amended complaint supersedes and replaces the original complaint, see Flannery v. Recording Indus. Ass'n of Am., 354 F.3d 632, 638 n. 1 (7th Cir.2004), any amended complaint must stand on its own, without reference to any previous pleading. To the extent Garner intends for these documents to be construed as an Amended Complaint, the Court DISMISSES both documents without prejudice. Garner is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint. To aid Garner in his efforts, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Garner a Section 1983 Complaint Form. Garner’s Amended Complaint is now due February 7, 2022. Failure to file an Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of this entire action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 11, 2022 Tq NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL | Chief U.S. District Judge

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garner v. Burrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-burrell-ilsd-2022.