Garner, Clarence Benard

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2022
DocketWR-92,954-02
StatusPublished

This text of Garner, Clarence Benard (Garner, Clarence Benard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner, Clarence Benard, (Tex. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,954-01 & WR-92,954-02

EX PARTE CLARENCE BENARD GARNER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2019-0400-A & 2019-0401-A IN THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ANGELINA COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of delivery of marijuana in two cause numbers

and sentenced to fifteen months’ state jail imprisonment in one and five years’ imprisonment in the

other. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that plea was involuntary because he did not understand that he was

facing five years’ flat time imprisonment due to the drug free zone finding in one of his cases. He

states that he believed he was pleading guilty to identical delivery of marijuana offenses and if he

knew he was going to have to serve five years in prison, he would have gone to a jury trial.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle to relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 2

(1970). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to

forward to this Court, among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed,

transcripts of all depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official

records used by the court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX . R. APP . P.

73.4(b)(4). The record forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. According to

the judgments, Applicant pleaded guilty under a plea agreement. The writ records contain no

documents relating to his guilty pleas. On August 3, 2021, this Court issued an order to the Angelina

district clerk ordering the supplementation of the record with plea documents. The clerk never

responded to that order.

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court shall

also ensure that the habeas record is supplemented with the plea papers for both cause numbers. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial

court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at

the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

plea was involuntary. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from 3

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 20, 2022 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. United States
397 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garner, Clarence Benard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-clarence-benard-texcrimapp-2022.