Garner Be K Construction

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedNovember 29, 2000
DocketI.C. No. 529842
StatusPublished

This text of Garner Be K Construction (Garner Be K Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner Be K Construction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Opinion

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and in a Pre-Trial Agreement admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #1, as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act.

2. On 1 April 1995, an employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer.

3. Weyerhauser is the carrier on risk.

4. Plaintiffs average weekly wage on 1 April 1995 was $1,110.20, yielding the maximum compensation rate for 1995 of $478.00 per week.

5. On 1 April 1995, plaintiff sustained a compensable injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer.

6. The Full Commission Opinion and Award, filed 10 February 1997, with respect to plaintiffs 1 April 1995 injury, is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #2.

7. The 1 July 1997 Order by Tracey Weaver is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #3.

8. Plaintiffs Responses to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #4.

9. The Form 33, filed by defendants on 2 March 1998, is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #5.

10. The Form 33R, filed by plaintiff on 5 March 1998, is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #6.

11. Plaintiffs medicals regarding this claim are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #7.

12. A millwright job description from defendant-employer is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #8.

13. Stipulated Exhibit #9 consists of the following videos, and are admitted into evidence:

(a) Video dated 13 and 14 November 1997;

(b) Video dated 15 November 1997;

(c) Video dated between January and February 1998.

14. Plaintiffs 1995 tax returns are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #10.

15. Plaintiffs 1996 tax returns are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #11.

16. Plaintiffs 1997 tax returns are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #12.

17. The Full Commission takes Judicial Notice of the transcript from the prior hearing of 14 December 1995, and the depositions that are a part of that record.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence adduced at the hearing, the Full Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 1 April 1995, plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to his back arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer.

2. As a result of this compensable injury, plaintiff received temporary total disability from 7 April 1995 through 27 July 1995, in accordance with the Full Commission Opinion and Award filed on 10 February 1997.

3. The 10 February 1997 Full Commission Opinion and Award also awarded "temporary partial disability at the rate of $478.00 per week from 28 July 1995 and continuing for 300 weeks from 1 April 1995, less the number of weeks during which plaintiff received temporary total disability compensation, or until further Order of the Industrial Commission. The Full Commission 10 February 1997 Opinion and Award found as fact that plaintiff was working as a disc jockey earning $60.00 a week and that as a result, his wage earning capacity was diminished by $1,050.20 per week. Plaintiffs diminished wage earning capacity was determined by subtracting his current average weekly wage of $60.00 from the disc jockey job from his pre-injury average weekly wage of $1,110.20, yielding $1,050.20. This finding of fact established plaintiffs wage earning capacity at $60.00 per week. The Full Commission did not, as defendants contend, determine that plaintiffs wage earning capacity varied from week to week depending on his earnings.

4. Following issuance of the 10 February 1997 Full Commission Opinion and Award which was not appealed, defendants questioned whether they were to pay ? of the difference between actual earnings and plaintiffs former average weekly wage of $1,110.20, or the $478.00 they were ordered to pay under the 10 February 1997 Opinion and Award. Defendants unilaterally and without permission of the Commission, stopped paying benefits to plaintiff.

5. When defendants failed to pay partial disability benefits as ordered by the Full Commission, plaintiff filed a motion on 21 April 1997 for a 10% late penalty on compensation due. Defendants did not respond to plaintiffs motion and Tracey Weaver, the Executive Secretary of the Industrial Commission, issued an Order on 1 July 1997 ordering defendants to pay a 10% late payment penalty on all amounts of compensation that had not been paid within 14 days of the date such compensation became due. Defendants did not appeal from or file a Motion for Reconsideration of the administrative order of the Executive Secretary as allowed by Industrial Commission Rule 703.

6. Instead of complying with the Executive Secretary's Order and the previous Full Commission Opinion and Award, defendants filed a Form 33 Request for Hearing on 3 March 1998. Defendants statement of the reasons for the Request for Hearing were that "plaintiff will not respond to discovery and defendants are unable to determine the extent, if any, of wage earning limitations. Plaintiffs Form 33R response to the Form 33 Request for Hearing indicates plaintiff had previously provided the information requested in defendants interrogatories. Defendants did not file a motion to modify plaintiffs compensation due to a change of condition (increase in earning capacity), as allowed by N.C. Gen. Stat.97-47.

7. Defendants served interrogatories and request for production on 10 December 1997. Plaintiff responded to these interrogatories 5 March 1998. These interrogatories contained statements from plaintiffs subsequent employers concerning wages plaintiff earned, as well as plaintiffs sworn statements concerning these wages. Allowing three days for receipt of mail, defendants had the wage information sought through discovery by 8 March 1998, but still did not resume payment of partial disability.

8. Plaintiff worked as a parasail boat captain from 15 May 1997 through 13 September 1997 at an average weekly wage of $180.00 per week. Plaintiffs earnings of $180.00 per week still would entitled him to the maximum weekly compensation rate of $478.00 per week in partial disability compensation.

9. In September 1997 plaintiff and his wife moved to Florida where plaintiff became employed by Longboat Pass Parasail. Plaintiff earned $175.00 per week in this position from 22 September 1997 through 30 June 1998. These earnings would not have reduced defendants obligation to pay $478.00 per week in partial disability compensation.

10. On 1 July 1998 plaintiff took a job as a captain with another parasail company earning $350.00 per week. Plaintiff was employed in this position at the time of the hearing before Deputy Commissioner Stephenson. These earnings would not reduce defendants obligation to pay plaintiff partial disability at the rate of $478.00 per week, the maximum compensation rate for 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grantham v. R. G. Barry Corp.
491 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garner Be K Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-be-k-construction-ncworkcompcom-2000.