Garnell Steven Hill v. Lieutenant L. R. Vann, Co Ivc Lieutenant Warren, Co IV Sergeant Henderson, East/side Eci

980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 364542
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 1992
Docket92-6664
StatusUnpublished

This text of 980 F.2d 727 (Garnell Steven Hill v. Lieutenant L. R. Vann, Co Ivc Lieutenant Warren, Co IV Sergeant Henderson, East/side Eci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garnell Steven Hill v. Lieutenant L. R. Vann, Co Ivc Lieutenant Warren, Co IV Sergeant Henderson, East/side Eci, 980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 364542 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

980 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Garnell Steven HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant L. R. VANN, CO IVC; Lieutenant Warren, CO IV;
Sergeant Henderson, East/Side ECI, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6664.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 15, 1992
Decided: December 11, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-2545-B)

Garnell Steven Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Garnell Steven Hill appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Vann, No. CA-91-2545-B (D. Md. May 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
980 F.2d 727, 1992 WL 364542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garnell-steven-hill-v-lieutenant-l-r-vann-co-ivc-l-ca4-1992.