Garms v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Garms v. State

88 S.W.2d 1116

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 18, 1935

DocketNo. 17871

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.W.2d 1116 (Garms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garms v. State, 88 S.W.2d 1116 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. There are requests for certain instructions to the jury which cannot be appraised in the absence of the statement of facts. The indictment appears regular and regularly presented.

Nothing has been perceived in the record which would authorize a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. There are requests for certain instructions to the jury which cannot be appraised in the absence of the statement of facts. The indictment appears regular and regularly presented.

Nothing has been perceived in the record which would authorize a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.W.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garms-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.