Garms v. Garms, No. 087419 (Dec. 23, 1993)
Opinion
1. The court made no allocation between current payments and arrearage payments. The periodic alimony order was reduced to $250.
2. The order is not retroactive. The defendant did not serve his motion upon the plaintiff pursuant to
3. The life insurance ordered to be carried by the defendant is not terminated or reduced.
HARRIGAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 11223 (Garms v. Garms, No. 087419 (Dec. 23, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.