Garmony v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garmony v. State

452 So. 2d 1042, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13829

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2081

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 452 So. 2d 1042 (Garmony v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garmony v. State, 452 So. 2d 1042, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wesley Garmony appeals from his convictions of and sentences for two counts of robbery with a firearm.

We .find no merit to defendant’s claim that he committed one robbery rather than two. See Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Hillman v. State, 410 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

As his second point on appeal, defendant claims that the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over one-half of his sentence. [1043]*1043Defendant failed to raise this point in the lower court, and therefore the issue was not preserved for appeal. See Springfield v. State, 443 So.2d 484 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

We affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences, but do so without prejudice to his ability to raise the retention of jurisdiction issue in the lower court in a properly filed motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850.

RYDER, C.J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI