Garmong v. Dist. Ct. (Wespac)

Opinion

relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that the district court either had a legal duty to deny the motion to compel arbitration or arbitrarily or capriciously abused its discretion or exceeded its jurisdiction by granting the motion. See id. We

therefore deny the petition. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

It is so ORDERED.

C.J.

J.

J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Carl M. Hebert Sinai Schroeder Mooney Boetsch Bradley & Pace Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 19474 ew