Garman v. Commonwealth

399 A.2d 1172, 41 Pa. Commw. 589, 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1432
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 11, 1979
DocketAppeal, No. 1203 C.D. 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 399 A.2d 1172 (Garman v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garman v. Commonwealth, 399 A.2d 1172, 41 Pa. Commw. 589, 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1432 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Jackie R. Garman (Claimant) appeals a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits pursuant to Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act).1

[591]*591The Board found that:

5. The claimant has been medically unable to accept gainful employment since July 20, 1975. The date when she will be able to accept gainful employment is uncertain.
6. The claimant was medically unable to accept gainful employment during the period in question.

Claimant contends that Board’s decision constituted a capricious disregard of competent evidence.

We disagree.

Claimant had been terminated July 7, 1975, from Penn Optical Co. because of excessive absenteeism. The record includes a doctor’s certification submitted by Claimant dated December 15, 1975, which indicates that she was advised to quit for health reasons, that as of July 20, 1975, she was unable to accept gainful employment and that it was uncertain when Claimant would eventually be able to accept employment. The December 15,1975 certificate noted that Claimant was suffering pain and in need of surgery. This we agree is sufficient to support the findings of the Board and thus conclusive. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 406 Pa. 163, 176 A.2d 632 (1962).

Claimant contends that evidence of record contradicts this evidence, but this Court has regularly held that Board is not required to accept as true even uncontradicted testimony. Koba v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 29 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 264, 370 A.2d 815 (1977).

The Board’s denial of benefits to Claimant because she was medically unable to work is appropriate under Section 401(d) and the record fails to reveal a capricious disregard of competent evidence.

[592]*592Accordingly, we

Order

And Now, this 11th day of April, 1979, Decision No. B-144491 of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodrigques v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
427 A.2d 1255 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Daley v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
426 A.2d 1299 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 A.2d 1172, 41 Pa. Commw. 589, 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garman-v-commonwealth-pacommwct-1979.