Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
68 A.D. 651, 77 N.Y.S. 1127
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1902
StatusPublished
This text of 68 A.D. 651 (Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 68 A.D. 651, 77 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Sciolina v. Erie P. Co. (151 N. Y. 50) and Meeker v. Remington & Sons Co. (Opinion by O’Brien, J., Court of Appeals, not published.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sciolina v. . Erie Preserving Co.
45 N.E. 371 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 A.D. 651, 77 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlock-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1902.