Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
68 A.D. 651, 77 N.Y.S. 1127
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Sciolina v. Erie P. Co. (151 N. Y. 50) and Meeker v. Remington & Sons Co. (Opinion by O’Brien, J., Court of Appeals, not published.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 68 A.D. 651, 77 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).
68 A.D. 651 (Garlock v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sciolina v. . Erie Preserving Co.
45 N.E. 371 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)