Garlington v. State

148 S.W. 588, 67 Tex. Crim. 305, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 8, 1912
DocketNo. 1762.
StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.W. 588 (Garlington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garlington v. State, 148 S.W. 588, 67 Tex. Crim. 305, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425 (Tex. 1912).

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

—By proper complaint and information appellant was charged with preventing another from performing his duty in a lawful employment by acts of violence and intimidation. The charge submits the question properly under the pleadings.

There is no statement of facts nor bills of exceptions. Hence, we can not consider any of the questions attempted to be raised by the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giles v. State
148 S.W. 317 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.W. 588, 67 Tex. Crim. 305, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlington-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.