Garlington v. Clutton

5 Va. 452, 1 Call 520, 1799 Va. LEXIS 13
CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedApril 27, 1799
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Va. 452 (Garlington v. Clutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garlington v. Clutton, 5 Va. 452, 1 Call 520, 1799 Va. LEXIS 13 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).

Opinion

LYONS, Judge.

How would you try the matter of fact in a writ of error from a Superior Court? Is it not necessary, that there should be a jury to ascertain the fact ? and, if so, can the appellate Court try it?

Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the judgment was to be affirmed. That where the parties agree, that the suit shall not abate by the death of the plaintiff or defendant, the whole Court were of opinion that the agreement is binding on them; and, being entered of record, operates like a release of errors. That, therefore, that point might, hereafter, be considered as settled. That its being called a demurrer, instead of a plea, was immaterial and not to be regarded, as the fact itself was shewn; which was all that was necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGuire v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
6 Daly 70 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Va. 452, 1 Call 520, 1799 Va. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlington-v-clutton-vactapp-1799.