Garlinger v. Garlinger

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Garlinger v. Garlinger

1 Balt. C. Rep. 163

DecidedMarch 20, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 163 (Garlinger v. Garlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garlinger v. Garlinger, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 163 (Md. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

The defendant has a salary of $1,400 per annum. The plaintiff gets $4.50 per week. There is a child of tender years, now being supported by the mother. The father ought to contribute to its support. Under all the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the order nisi will be so modified as to omit counsel fee and reduce the weekly allowance from five to three dollars per week, accounting as therein stated from the 19th of September, 1890.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHELPS, J.

The defendant has a salary of $1,400 per annum. The plaintiff gets $4.50 per week. There is a child of tender years, now being supported by the mother. The father ought to contribute to its support. Under all the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the order nisi will be so modified as to omit counsel fee and reduce the weekly allowance from five to three dollars per week, accounting as therein stated from the 19th of September, 1890.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlinger-v-garlinger-mdcirctctbalt-1891.