Garliner v. Allan Herschell Co.

8 A.D.2d 989, 188 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7621

This text of 8 A.D.2d 989 (Garliner v. Allan Herschell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garliner v. Allan Herschell Co., 8 A.D.2d 989, 188 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the plain tiff-appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been presented to the jury. All concur. (Cross appeals from a judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and defendant’s counterclaim after motions by both parties as to the complaint and a motion by plaintiff as to defendant’s counterclaim, in an action for damages 'for an alleged breach of contract.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 989, 188 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garliner-v-allan-herschell-co-nyappdiv-1959.