Garlikov v. Continental Casualty Co.

1993 Ohio 127, 68 Ohio St. 3d 91
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 1993·No. 1993-0577·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In our recent opinion in Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809, we held:

“Each person who is covered by an uninsured/underinsured policy and who is presumed to be damaged pursuant to R.C. 2125.01 has a separate claim subject to a separate per person policy limit.” Savoie, supra, paragraph four of syllabus.

This holding directly answers the question posed by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garlikov v. Continental Casualty Co., 1993 Ohio 127, 68 Ohio St. 3d 91 (Ohio 1993).

1993 Ohio 127 (Garlikov v. Continental Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garlikov v. Continental Cas. Co.
626 N.E.2d 689 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)