Garlick v. Vitale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garlick v. Vitale

25 A.D.2d 917, 270 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4157

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 917 (Garlick v. Vitale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garlick v. Vitale, 25 A.D.2d 917, 270 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

As to the sufficiency of the award to the plaintiff wife, there were present only questions of fact or credibility as to whether her low back injury was causally connected to the accident whieh the jury could clearly resolve as it did, Furthermore, there is no necessary inconsistency in the jury’s verdict of “no compensation in order” for the plaintiff husband. The jury could properly find that plaintiff did not sustain the burden of proving that any aetual damages or expenses were attributable to the aeeident. (See Leonard v. Voltz, 190 App. Div. 748, affd. 232 N. Y. 575.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

As to the sufficiency of the award to the plaintiff wife, there were present only questions of fact or credibility as to whether her low back injury was causally connected to the accident whieh the jury could clearly resolve as it did, Furthermore, there is no necessary inconsistency in the jury’s verdict of “no compensation in order” for the plaintiff husband. The jury could properly find that plaintiff did not sustain the burden of proving that any aetual damages or expenses were attributable to the aeeident. (See Leonard v. Voltz, 190 App. Div. 748, affd. 232 N. Y. 575.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 917, 270 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlick-v-vitale-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack