Garland v. State

70 So. 3d 609, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9880, 2010 WL 2671904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 2010·No. 1D09-1637·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WOLF, J.

On the court’s own motion, we withdraw our previous opinion dated February 5, 2010, and substitute the following in its place.

Appellant raises a number of issues. We affirm as to all issues but one: whether appellant’s sentence of life in prison for crimes he committed when he was a juvenile violates constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. Florida, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), we quash his sentence and remand for resentencing and for appointment of conflict-free counsel.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings.

HAWKES, C.J., and DAVIS, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland v. State, 70 So. 3d 609, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9880, 2010 WL 2671904 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

70 So. 3d 609 (Garland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Treacy v. Lamberti
141 So. 3d 174 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
State v. Smith
107 So. 3d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Treacy v. Lamberti
80 So. 3d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)