Garland v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Garland v. Gordon

144 A. 829, 295 Pa. 99, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 634

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 3, 1928

DocketAppeal, 91

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 144 A. 829 (Garland v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garland v. Gordon, 144 A. 829, 295 Pa. 99, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 634 (Pa. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: “We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried.” In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that “the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal”; that authority rules this case.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: “We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried.” In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that “the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal”; that authority rules this case.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A. 829, 295 Pa. 99, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-gordon-pa-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack