Garland v. Gordon

144 A. 829, 295 Pa. 99, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 634
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 3, 1928·No. Appeal, 91·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: “We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried.” In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that “the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal”; that authority rules this case.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland v. Gordon, 144 A. 829, 295 Pa. 99, 1929 Pa. LEXIS 634 (Pa. 1928).

144 A. 829 (Garland v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamberton National Bank v. Shakespeare
184 A. 669 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Mandel v. M. Freeland
100 Pa. Super. 81 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Dzaack v. Bell Telephone Co.
145 A. 916 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)