Garland v. Garland
275 A.D.2d 847
Opinion
Under the circumstances here shown, counsel fee should not have been allowed. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N. Y. 402, 404; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 137 N. Y. 500; Fishman v. Fishman, 275 App. Div. 777.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garland v. Garland, 275 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 847 (Garland v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCarthy v. . McCarthy
33 N.E. 550 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Beadleston v. . Beadleston
8 N.E. 735 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)