Garland v. Fahey
This text of Garland v. Fahey (Garland v. Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7166
TIMOTHY L. GARLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HELEN FAHEY, Chairperson of VA Parole Board,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00163-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy L. Garland, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Timothy L. Garland appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Garland v. Fahey, No.
2:08-cv-00163-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. June 16, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garland v. Fahey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-fahey-ca4-2008.