Garland v. Enos

4 Munf. 504, 18 Va. 504, 1815 Va. LEXIS 50
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided November 23, 1815·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Judge Roane

pronounced the-court’s opinion, as follows :

The court is of opinion, that the decree in this case is erroneous, in not having dismissed the bill of the appellees, as well as to the appellant, as to the defendant Shackelford, therein named ; it appearing, from the evidence in the cause, that the title to the slaves demanded by the bill was yesled in the appellant, by an adversary possession of them for more than five years, by the said Shackelford, under whom the appellant claims. The decree is therefore to be reversed with, costs, and the bill dismissed as to the appellant also.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland v. Enos, 4 Munf. 504, 18 Va. 504, 1815 Va. LEXIS 50 (Va. 1815).

4 Munf. 504 (Garland v. Enos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rees v. Rees
96 S.E. 1019 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1918)
Morris v. Lyon
4 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1888)
Divine v. Bullock
60 Ky. 418 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1861)
Hunt's Adm'r v. Martin's Adm'r
8 Va. 578 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
Huston's adm'r v. Cantril
11 Va. 142 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1840)