Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co.
527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668
Opinion
We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellee on the authority of McKinnie v. Progressive American Insurance Co., 488 So.2d 825 (Fla.1986), and Bayles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 483 So.2d 402 (Fla.1985). We note that Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Smith, 527 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), is not controlling here because the amendment to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is applicable only to new and renewal policies with [836] an effective date beginning October 1, 1984, or later.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co., 527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
527 So. 2d 835 (Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bayles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
483 So. 2d 402 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith
527 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)