Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co.

527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1978
StatusPublished

This text of 527 So. 2d 835 (Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garland v. Dixie Insurance Co., 527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellee on the authority of McKinnie v. Progressive American Insurance Co., 488 So.2d 825 (Fla.1986), and Bayles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 483 So.2d 402 (Fla.1985). We note that Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Smith, 527 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), is not controlling here because the amendment to section 627.727, Florida Statutes, is applicable only to new and renewal policies with [836]*836an effective date beginning October 1, 1984, or later.

DOWNEY, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bayles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
483 So. 2d 402 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith
527 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 So. 2d 835, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1648, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934, 1988 WL 70668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-dixie-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1988.