Garland v. Dixie Ins. Co.
This text of 495 So. 2d 785 (Garland v. Dixie Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ruby GARLAND, Appellant,
v.
DIXIE INSURANCE CO., a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Steven D. Miller of Mark Marks, P.A., North Miami, for appellant.
Steven R. Berger of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, and Pomeroy, Pomeroy & Pomeroy, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, for failure of her counsel to appear at a scheduled pretrial conference, upon the authority of Beasley v. Girten, 61 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1952) and Crystal Lake Golf Course v. Kalin, 252 So.2d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).
Dismissal of the complaint was too severe a sanction in this matter because the record does not show willful or intentional disregard of the trial court's order. However, this reversal is without prejudice to the entry of a lesser sanction against plaintiff or her counsel.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
495 So. 2d 785, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-dixie-ins-co-fladistctapp-1986.