Garland v. Davidson
This text of 3 Va. 189 (Garland v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered ¶ the court’s opinion.
“ The court (not deciding any other question occurring in this case) is of opinion that the declaration is de* fective in this, that it is not expressly averred therein that the appellant Clifton Garland, or the firm of Walker Garland, promised to pay the debt in the declarations mentioned; but that W:ilium Walke-- only so promised. The judgment is, therefore, to be reversed, and entered for the appellant.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Va. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-davidson-va-1812.