Garland v. Chattle
12 Johns. 430
This text of 12 Johns. 430 (Garland v. Chattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Garland v. Chattle, 12 Johns. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).
Opinion
The variance between the declaration and the writ, should have been taken advantage of in the proper time; but after plea pleaded by the defendant, Chattle, it is too late for him to make the objection. The writ was issued within the six years, and the declaration is to be considered as a continuance of the same suit, so that the statute was no bar. The motion: must be denied.
Motion denied*
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reeder v. Moore
55 N.W. 436 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Maples v. Mackey
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 228 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Cornell v. Matthews
27 N.J.L. 522 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1859)
Day v. New England Car-Spring Co.
7 F. Cas. 252 (U.S. Circuit Court for New York, 1854)
Beekman v. Satterlee
5 Cow. 519 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Buckwalter v. United States
11 Serg. & Rawle 193 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1824)
Society for Propagating the Gospel v. Whitcomb
2 N.H. 227 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1820)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Johns. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-chattle-nysupct-1815.