Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420

485 S.W.3d 779, 2016 WL 1317973
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103187
StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 779 (Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420, 485 S.W.3d 779, 2016 WL 1317973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcia J. Garland (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of AFT St. Louis Local 420 on Appellant’s Petition alleging discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in refusing to submit Appellant’s proffered verdict director as it amounted to an impermissible roving commission. Klotz v. St. Anthony’s Med. Ctr., 311 S.W.3d 752, 766 (Mo.2010), as modified (May 25, 2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum [780]*780setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klotz v. St. Anthony's Medical Center
311 S.W.3d 752 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 S.W.3d 779, 2016 WL 1317973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-aft-st-louis-local-420-moctapp-2016.