Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420

485 S.W.3d 779, 2016 WL 1317973
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 2016·No. No. ED 103187·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcia J. Garland (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of AFT St. Louis Local 420 on Appellant’s Petition alleging discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in refusing to submit Appellant’s proffered verdict director as it amounted to an impermissible roving commission. Klotz v. St. Anthony’s Med. Ctr., 311 S.W.3d 752, 766 (Mo.2010), as modified (May 25, 2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum [780] setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420, 485 S.W.3d 779, 2016 WL 1317973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

485 S.W.3d 779 (Garland v. AFT St. Louis Local 420) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klotz v. St. Anthony's Medical Center
311 S.W.3d 752 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2010)