Garippa v. Wisotsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garippa v. Wisotsky

280 A.D. 807, 113 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3780

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when he was allegedly struck by a truck owned by defendant Wisotsky and driven by defendant Horn, defendants appeal from an amended judgment entered on a decision in plaintiff’s favor after trial before the court without a jury. Amended judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the amended judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the grounds that plaintiff’s proof and the fair inferences which may be drawn therefrom fail to establish a cause of action against defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when he was allegedly struck by a truck owned by defendant Wisotsky and driven by defendant Horn, defendants appeal from an amended judgment entered on a decision in plaintiff’s favor after trial before the court without a jury. Amended judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the amended judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the grounds that plaintiff’s proof and the fair inferences which may be drawn therefrom fail to establish a cause of action against defendants.

Garippa v. Wisotsky, 280 A.D. 807, 113 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

280 A.D. 807 (Garippa v. Wisotsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related