Garippa v. Wisotsky
This text of 280 A.D. 807 (Garippa v. Wisotsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when he was allegedly struck by a truck owned by defendant Wisotsky and driven by defendant Horn, defendants appeal from an amended judgment entered on a decision in plaintiff’s favor after trial before the court without a jury. Amended judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the amended judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the grounds that plaintiff’s proof and the fair inferences which may be drawn therefrom fail to establish a cause of action against defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D. 807, 113 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garippa-v-wisotsky-nyappdiv-1952.