Garfunkle v. Haupt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garfunkle v. Haupt

246 A.D. 603

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The action is to recover $7,550 paid by plaintiff to defendants for certain stock and is based upon plaintiff’s claim that he rescinded the contract. Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of order, upon payment of said costs and the costs awarded to the defendants by the order appealed from. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is to recover $7,550 paid by plaintiff to defendants for certain stock and is based upon plaintiff’s claim that he rescinded the contract. Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of order, upon payment of said costs and the costs awarded to the defendants by the order appealed from. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Garfunkle v. Haupt, 246 A.D. 603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 603 (Garfunkle v. Haupt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.