Garfunkle v. Haupt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garfunkle v. Haupt

246 A.D. 603

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 603 (Garfunkle v. Haupt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garfunkle v. Haupt, 246 A.D. 603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The action is to recover $7,550 paid by plaintiff to defendants for certain stock and is based upon plaintiff’s claim that he rescinded the contract. Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of order, upon payment of said costs and the costs awarded to the defendants by the order appealed from. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is to recover $7,550 paid by plaintiff to defendants for certain stock and is based upon plaintiff’s claim that he rescinded the contract. Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of order, upon payment of said costs and the costs awarded to the defendants by the order appealed from. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfunkle-v-haupt-nyappdiv-1935.