Garfunkel v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garfunkel v. Schwartz

204 A.D.2d 545, 614 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 545 (Garfunkel v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garfunkel v. Schwartz, 204 A.D.2d 545, 614 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award of a Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, Aaron Schwartz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered August 19, 1992, as confirmed the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the arbitration award of the Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623). We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v Quentzel, 193 AD2d 678; Matter of Goltz [Ripps], 88 AD2d 1052). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, O’Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award of a Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, Aaron Schwartz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered August 19, 1992, as confirmed the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the arbitration award of the Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623). We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v Quentzel, 193 AD2d 678; Matter of Goltz [Ripps], 88 AD2d 1052). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, O’Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 545, 614 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfunkel-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack