Garfunkel v. Schwartz

204 A.D.2d 545, 614 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award of a Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, Aaron Schwartz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered August 19, 1992, as confirmed the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the arbitration award of the Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623). We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v Quentzel, 193 AD2d 678; Matter of Goltz [Ripps], 88 AD2d 1052). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, O’Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garfunkel v. Schwartz, 204 A.D.2d 545, 614 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 545 (Garfunkel v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & Nomberg
389 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re the Arbitration between Goltz & Ripps
88 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Henry Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v. Quentzel
193 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)