Garfinkle v. Sheriff
This text of 529 P.2d 794 (Garfinkle v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we [419]*419need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).
Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 P.2d 794, 90 Nev. 418, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfinkle-v-sheriff-nev-1974.