Garfinkle v. Sheriff

529 P.2d 794, 90 Nev. 418, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 415
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1974·No. No. 7612·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we [419] need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).

Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garfinkle v. Sheriff, 529 P.2d 794, 90 Nev. 418, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 415 (Neb. 1974).

529 P.2d 794 (Garfinkle v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. Sheriff of Carson City
512 P.2d 774 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Cairns v. Sheriff, Clark County
508 P.2d 1015 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Schmitt v. State
497 P.2d 891 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1972)
Maskaly v. State
450 P.2d 790 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1969)
Mears v. State
422 P.2d 230 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)