Garfinkle v. Sheriff
Opinion
OPINION
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we [419] need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).
Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
529 P.2d 794 (Garfinkle v. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.