Garfield v. United States ex rel. Vaughan

212 U.S. 589, 29 S. Ct. 691, 53 L. Ed. 663, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 2113
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 18, 1909
DocketNo. 371; No. 372; No. 373; No. 374
StatusPublished

This text of 212 U.S. 589 (Garfield v. United States ex rel. Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garfield v. United States ex rel. Vaughan, 212 U.S. 589, 29 S. Ct. 691, 53 L. Ed. 663, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 2113 (1909).

Opinion

In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. January 18, 1909. Dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles J. Kappler, Mr: Charles H. Merillat, Mr. James K. Jones and Mr. Charles M: Fechheimer for defendants in error in Nos. 371, 372 and 373. No appearance for defendant in error in No. 374.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 U.S. 589, 29 S. Ct. 691, 53 L. Ed. 663, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 2113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfield-v-united-states-ex-rel-vaughan-scotus-1909.