Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison

211 U.S. 264, 29 S. Ct. 67, 53 L. Ed. 176, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1542
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 30, 1908·No. 249, 250·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the court.

These cases were argued and submitted with the Goldsby Case, No. 248, just decided. In the case of George A. Allison, a patent had been issued for his lands and duly recorded. In the case of Ida Allison, an allotment certificate had been issued.

The relators are Cherokees, but the legislation herein involved is not different from that governing allotments to members of the Chickasaw Nation.

The Allisons made application to the commission for admission to citizenship under-the act of June 10, 1896. Their applications were denied and no appeal taken. Afterwards a decision by the commission, granting the application of the Allisons for enrollment as citizens by blood, was affirmed by the Department of the Interior as of April 16, 1904. Their names were summarily stricken from the rolls by the department’s order of March 4, 1907. The cases are controlled by the decision in Goldsby’s Case.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison, 211 U.S. 264, 29 S. Ct. 67, 53 L. Ed. 176, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1542 (1908).

211 U.S. 264 (Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney General v. Detroit United Railway
210 Mich. 227 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Devil's Den Consol, Oil Co. v. United States
251 F. 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1918)
La Clair v. United States
184 F. 128 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington, 1910)