Garfield v. Knight's Ferry & Table Mountain Water Co.

17 Cal. 510
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1861·No. No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

The finding in this case is in the nature of a special verdict. It is that the work was done at the instance of Kappelman & Co., who were the agents of the defendant—the defendant being a corporation. It was claimed by the defendant that though Kappelman & Co. were agents, they were also contractors, and that they employed the plaintiff in this last capacity. There is no necessary inconsistency between a man being an agent and his contracting in an individual capacity; and the very question here was, as to what capacity Kappelman & Co. acted in making this contract. The rule is that enough must be found by a special verdict or finding, when that is relied on as the basis of a judgment, to show in and of itself a legal conclusion of liability. This is not done here. We must, therefore, reverse the judgment, that the issue may be directly and explicitly found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garfield v. Knight's Ferry & Table Mountain Water Co., 17 Cal. 510 (Cal. 1861).

17 Cal. 510 (Garfield v. Knight's Ferry & Table Mountain Water Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Harris
153 P.2d 904 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1944)