Garfield v. Holz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garfield v. Holz

1 A.D.2d 820, 150 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 820 (Garfield v. Holz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garfield v. Holz, 1 A.D.2d 820, 150 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

The order of Special Term should be affirmed. It may not be said that the refusal of the Superintendent of Insurance and the Attorney-General, was without reasonable basis. We do not pass upon any of the other questions ruled upon by Special Term, including the question as to whether this policyholder has the right to institute suit. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order of Special Term should be affirmed. It may not be said that the refusal of the Superintendent of Insurance and the Attorney-General, was without reasonable basis. We do not pass upon any of the other questions ruled upon by Special Term, including the question as to whether this policyholder has the right to institute suit. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 820, 150 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfield-v-holz-nyappdiv-1956.