Garfield v. Coe

148 F.2d 682, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 56, 64 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 540, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 1945
DocketNo. 8815
StatusPublished

This text of 148 F.2d 682 (Garfield v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garfield v. Coe, 148 F.2d 682, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 56, 64 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 540, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506 (D.C. Cir. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The findings and judgment of the trial court find full support in the record. Appellants have failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding1 and are not entitled to a patent.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. Coe
109 F.2d 449 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)
Daniels v. Coe
116 F.2d 941 (D.C. Circuit, 1940)
Morrison v. Coe
127 F.2d 737 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 F.2d 682, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 56, 64 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 540, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfield-v-coe-cadc-1945.