Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey

17 Misc. 148, 39 N.Y.S. 333
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 15, 1896·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We decide, in- this case, that the order must be. reversed, upon the ground that the General Term óf the City Court had the power to review the decision of the Special Term, although the order made at Special Term was one resting in the discretion of. the court; that the General Term had not only the power to review that order, but it was its duty to do so on appeal. Sprague v. Dunton, 14 Hun, 490; Peart v. Peart, 48 id. 79; Neresheimer v. Bowe, 11 Daly, 306.

The order of the General Term is reversed, and the cause remitted to the General Term, with directions to- hear the appeal. Ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. .

Present: Daly, R. J., McAdam and Bischoff, JJ.

Order reversed and cáse remitted with directions to hear appeal, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey, 17 Misc. 148, 39 N.Y.S. 333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

17 Misc. 148 (Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neresheimer v. Bowe
11 Daly 306 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)