Garfield Investment Co. v. Town of Oconomowoc
This text of 42 N.W.2d 361 (Garfield Investment Co. v. Town of Oconomowoc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The town concedes that there can be no legal tax levy for expenditures made by it on a private roadway, but seeks to defend against the plaintiff’s action on the ground that it was merely collection of a debt by the town which the plaintiff was estopped to deny because it had received the [100]*100benefits of the expenditures made by the town and had participated in similar transactions in previous years.
The town has no commercial status, and can obtain money from its citizens only by taxation. The levy in this case was an attempted levy of a special assessment and when the plaintiff paid it under protest, it paid it as a taxpayer, and is now entitled to maintain this action to recover it. The defense offered being sham, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor.
By the Court.- — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 N.W.2d 361, 257 Wis. 98, 1950 Wisc. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfield-investment-co-v-town-of-oconomowoc-wis-1950.